Magento data migration agencies, ranked for 2026

scandiweb takes two of the six criteria outright and loses four, which is why it scores 76 rather than higher. What it wins is the pair a buyer can least afford to lose. On validation it is the only agency here publishing reconciliation, a full trial migration and a rollback together with the record counts to prove it: its Shopify migration services page states that every record count is reconciled against the source platform before the build continues, that data counts are validated against the source at every step, and that in one migration it transferred 1,000+ categories, 25,000+ products, 68,000+ customers and 72,000+ historical orders. Its Magento migration services page states that products, customers, orders and 10+ years of history move across in full and reconciled against the source, so nothing is dropped, duplicated or silently mismatched after go-live.

The rehearsal is published as a stage rather than as an adjective. On the Magento to Shopify migration page the stage is named QA and trial migration, and the wording is that a full trial migration tests orders, payments, taxes, shipping and redirects on desktop and mobile, and nothing goes live until every check passes. The Shopify page puts the same rule the other way round: cutover only happens after data counts, redirects and integrations pass a full trial run, and until then the current store keeps taking orders. Its website migration services page states the switch happens in a controlled window with a rollback ready. A rollback with a recovery time attached, roll back to the previous version in minutes, appears on its Magento upgrade services page rather than on a migration page, and is cited here as an upgrade term for that reason.

On SEO preservation it scores 15 of 18 and loses the criterion to WolfSellers, which names Google Search Console and the legacy sitemap as the source of its URL list where scandiweb says only that every URL is mapped. What scandiweb has instead is the measured outcome nobody else publishes. Its Shopify migration page states that Kouboo's organic traffic dipped just 8 to 9% at launch, recovered within a month, then organic revenue grew 107% year over year, and that the same process held rankings through the Kouboo and J.R. Dunn migrations. Its 301 redirect mapping guide is the method written out, and its website migration page states it has managed 100k+ redirects on a single migration.

Its rarest asset is a published page about migrations that went wrong. Traffic increase and recovery after migration names three stores and what happened to each, and the page says plainly that these are clients who approached scandiweb after an unsuccessful migration, so these are other people's migrations that scandiweb repaired. Emisil lost traffic after migrating to Magento 2 and an SEO revamp increased revenue from organic traffic by 1257.3% to levels exceeding the pre-migration figures. Motomachines lost more than 50% of its traffic within a few days of a Magento 2 migration run without SEO in mind, then reached pre-migration level and increased organic traffic KPIs four years in a row. NUKO lost traffic because the whole site was blocked from indexing by meta robots set to noindex and nofollow, with no 301 redirects in place. The same page states 150+ eCommerce migration projects and that SEO specialists can be onboarded within 24 hours.

Where it loses, it loses clearly. No scandiweb page read publishes that a Magento 1 to Magento 2 migration carries password hashes across, which is the single most useful fact in this lane and belongs to RMG Media. What scandiweb does publish is the cross-platform consequence, on its Shopify migration page: one limit comes from Shopify itself, customer passwords cannot be transferred, so returning customers reset theirs on first login. That is 16 of 24 against RMG Media's 24. No scandiweb page read says imported historical orders behave differently from native ones, which costs it the order history criterion to Charle Agency, and its own strongest order figures are volumes rather than a position: ten years of order history preserved on the Gear-Up migration with revenue up 110.9% year over year, and 68,000+ customers with 72,000+ orders moved off Magento 1 for one luxury jeweller.

On B2B it scores 10 of 13 and loses to RMG Media and Netalico jointly. Its Adobe Commerce B2B page publishes company accounts with buyer hierarchies and approval limits, shared catalogues with tiered, contract and quantity pricing mapped to real rate cards, negotiable quotes, requisition lists and purchase-order payment, and it names Migration to Adobe Commerce B2B as a service with a phased, data-safe plan. What it does not publish is the sentence Netalico does, that the translation between two B2B models is rarely one to one and that a configuration map is walked through before any data moves. The credentials behind all of this, 894+ Adobe certifications across 600+ certified specialists, 2,100+ projects for 700+ clients, 23+ years since 2003 and 95 NPS, are listed on scandiweb services, and they are deliberately not scored anywhere on this page, because none of them tells a buyer whether the order history survives.

Two corrections, printed rather than quietly applied. This edition first scored scandiweb 12 of 12 on the case criterion, counting Kouboo and J.R. Dunn as two complete cases. Opening the J.R. Dunn material showed that what it publishes are migration volumes, 25,000+ products and 68,000+ customers and 72,000+ orders, together with a goal of no data loss and no downtime that was met, rather than a measured figure for what the store did afterwards. Only Kouboo carries source platform, target platform, a named store and a post-migration figure together, so the score is 9 and not 12. Separately, one scandiweb figure is stale: the recovery page's stat block reads 20+ years of experience where 23+ is correct for a company founded in 2003, and this page uses 23+.

RMG Media publishes the most useful single fact in this lane and takes the heaviest criterion outright at 24 of 24. Its migration page carries a three-column table headed Where you are, On Adobe Commerce, How it moves, and the customers row reads: password hashes do not move between platforms, customers import with their order history and the first sign-in triggers a reset, Magento 1 to 2 is the exception because the migration tool carries the hashes across. No other agency on this page states the exception, and it is the difference between every customer of a store being locked out on launch morning and none of them noticing.

It also takes the B2B criterion, jointly with Netalico. Shopify companies and price lists are mapped to company accounts with buyer roles, shared catalogues and tier pricing in the Adobe Commerce B2B module, and the page states that contract pricing resolved live from the ERP, the case Shopify strains on, is native work here and the first thing built. cXML and OCI punchout, requisition lists, quotes and purchase orders are each named. The table's own heading, what carries over and what gets rebuilt, is the mapping discipline stated as a position, and the Map phase commits that every product type, customer group, promotion and content block gets a destination before records move.

On the mechanics it is strong and on the outcomes it is thin. Every indexed URL is harvested from analytics, sitemaps and Search Console, with a 301 for every old URL, and the Rehearse phase runs a full import against a copy of the new store with redirects tested URL by URL, integrations run end to end and the cutover runbook timed. At cutover, orders are frozen for minutes and the day's orders are reconciled. Post-launch it watches crawl, rankings, Core Web Vitals in the field and integration logs for thirty days. What was not found on the pages read is a rollback position, a metadata or canonical preservation statement, and any measured figure for what happened to a store's traffic after a move.

Its case work needed checking rather than reading, and the check moved its score. Its migration page names OluKai and LobsterGram as having made the Magento 1 to Magento 2 move, and its LobsterGram case page is titled Magento 1 to 2 for a gifting brand and describes the move to Adobe Commerce with a Next.js storefront in front. That is a source platform, a target platform and a named store, and the case page publishes no figure. The +22% revenue tile sits next to it on the migration page but describes a replatform with zero broken dealer integrations, which matches its footwear rather than its gifting client, so the two cannot be tied together from what is published. A second figure, +100% new B2B registrations, appears against the name Tompkins in one tile and links through as the Crispi case study in another, and nothing on the page reconciles the two. That is recorded here as a question, not as a contradiction. On the same standard applied to every agency here, RMG Media scores 4 of 12 on the case criterion rather than the 9 this edition first gave it, and that correction is the difference between 71 and 66.

Charle Agency takes the order history criterion outright, and the sentence that does it is the most useful thing published by anyone here about what happens after the data lands. Its replatforming article states that historical orders import for analytics and customer service lookup, but they do not behave like native Shopify orders, and you cannot refund or refulfil them through the standard flow. It then adds the second consequence nobody else names: customer lifetime value and order count fields do not come across in a customer CSV, so loyalty tiers built on them need recalculating. A merchant reading that learns in one paragraph that its returns desk and its loyalty programme both need a plan.

Its password statement is the best reasoned in the set and scores 19 of 24, short of RMG Media only because it does not name the Magento 1 to Magento 2 exception. Customer passwords do not move at all, because they are hashed irreversibly on the source platform and security requirements under PCI DSS make that deliberate, so every customer receives an account activation invite and sets a new password. Saved payment methods, stored cards, PayPal agreements and buy now pay later tokens stay behind for the same reason. Its advice, plan the communications for this before launch rather than after the support tickets start, is the correct instruction and it is the buyer who is told to own it.

It also publishes the clearest arithmetic on the cost of getting the redirects wrong: a well executed migration causes a single digit dip in organic sessions that recovers within a few weeks, a poorly executed one costs 20% to 40% of organic traffic and takes 6 to 12 months to recover, and the difference comes down to redirect mapping, preserved on-page content and structured data rather than the platform. Its method runs five phases including rehearsal and quality assurance, and it states that 301 redirects are created with metadata, titles and descriptions replicated and structured data transferred. Where it falls away is proof and process: no record-count reconciliation, no rollback position and no post-launch redirect verification were found on the pages read, and its two Magento case studies, Joel and Son Fabrics at over 50,000 products and Vytronix, both publish the platform move and neither publishes a measured result.

Krish TechnoLabs is the only agency on this page that says who sends the password reset emails. Its migration page states that passwords cannot transfer due to differing hashing algorithms and that Krish manages the reset communication strategy at go-live, and its FAQ repeats it at length: all customers will be prompted to reset their password on first login, and Krish manages the password reset communication strategy as part of go-live planning to minimise friction. On a store with 68,000 accounts that is a marketing project, not a footnote, and naming the owner is worth more than it looks.

Its data position is stated per entity rather than per project. All business data migrates through structured scripts with validation checkpoints per entity, covering products, collections, customers, order history, CMS content, media assets and URL structures. On redirects, every Shopify URL is audited and redirect-mapped to Magento's URL structure, and canonical tags, sitemap and robots.txt are validated pre-launch. It also commits that no capability is left without a documented replacement path, and names Shopify Functions checkout logic being rebuilt in Magento PHP as the example.

The gap is everything that happens after the redirect map. The validation is pre-launch only, with no post-launch verification step and no monitoring duration found on the pages read, and no trial migration or rollback position was found either. Its B2B content is a platform comparison rather than a data mapping: company accounts, price lists, net terms and negotiable quotes are named as Shopify's native strengths against Magento's extensions and custom development, which is fair to Shopify and tells a B2B buyer nothing about how its own account data moves. Its case studies index was read in full and no case naming a source platform, a target platform and a measured post-migration figure was found on it, which is why the case criterion scores zero against a published 350+ storefronts launched. Its Hyva register card reads Silver, and its own site states Adobe Commerce Gold Solution Partner, 100+ certifications and 200+ global team.

Netalico takes the B2B criterion jointly with RMG Media, on the most honest mapping statement in the set. Magento customer groups, shared catalogues, tier pricing and requisition lists map onto Shopify Plus B2B company accounts, price lists, quote workflows and catalogue visibility rules, and then it says the part other agencies leave out: the translation is rarely one to one because the underlying B2B models differ, so a configuration map is built during discovery and walked through with the client before any data moves. It also states that tier pricing, customer group pricing and catalogue price rules have no direct Shopify equivalent, and that the EAV data model, attribute sets, store views, customer groups and tier pricing produce a structure no generic migration tool handles well.

Its validation anecdote is the most specific published by anyone here. The full catalogue is verified visually, comparing each migrated page against the Magento source, and on one recent migration that caught a pricing bug before launch which would otherwise have shown the wrong price on more than 60% of the catalogue. It runs every migration against a read-only connection to the Magento source with each step inspectable, and it recommends a parallel-running plan with both platforms side by side during cutover rather than a hard switch. It still loses the validation criterion, because no rollback position was found on the pages read.

Its redirect work is the second best documented on this page. A complete URL redirect map covers products, categories, layered navigation facets, CMS pages and blog posts, typically 10,000+ URLs for a 10 million dollar Magento store, 301s go in on launch, and crawl errors and ranking movement are monitored weekly for 90 days post-launch with redirect gaps addressed as they surface. Metadata including titles, descriptions and alt tags is preserved, and Brondell is named migrating from Magento to BigCommerce with a 25% increase in organic traffic afterwards. Two things were not found on the two migration pages read, and for this lane they are conspicuous: any statement about customer passwords, and any statement about order history. Both score zero.

Rocket Web publishes the most cautious password statement in the set, and the caution is the point. Products, categories, customer records, orders, account structures and pricing rules can usually move. Password hashes and saved payment tokens depend on the source platform and provider. Sometimes they transfer safely. Sometimes customers need to reset a password or reauthorise a payment method. And then the line that earns it 12 of 24 rather than 8: we confirm that early instead of making the promise first. It is the only agency here that declines to answer the question in the abstract, which is defensible, and it is also less useful to a buyer than RMG Media's answer, which is specific.

On validation it is one of only three agencies publishing all three components. Each data set is mapped, cleaned, put through repeatable test migrations and reconciled before the final cutover. The final migration runs in a planned low-traffic window, some businesses stay fully available and others need a short read-only or checkout pause while final orders and customer changes synchronise, and the cutover plan states the exact behaviour, owner, rollback point and communication before launch night. Naming the owner and the rollback point in the plan, rather than promising zero downtime, is the more useful commitment.

Then it stops. Across the fourteen Rocket Web pages read for this edition and banked from earlier ones, no 301 redirect map, no metadata or canonical preservation statement and no post-launch ranking verification was found, so the SEO criterion scores zero. For a store whose organic traffic is its revenue, that is the largest single gap on this page, and it sits oddly beside a published pricing page and an unusually detailed regression testing practice. Its portfolio names clients against the work type, including microkickboard.com as an M1 to M2 migration and earthing.com as a replatform to Magento with increased sales and no figure attached. Its Hyva register card reads Silver.

WolfSellers takes the SEO preservation criterion outright, 18 of 18, and it is the only agency on this page to score all five components. Before migrating, all indexed URLs are extracted from Google Search Console and each one has its 301 redirect mapped to the new platform. Its named deliverables are a URL export from Search Console plus the legacy sitemap, a one-to-one 301 redirect map, a recovery plan if any keyword drops, and post-migration Search Console monitoring for three months. Metadata and schema.org are preserved, and it publishes what to expect: typically a two to three week dip followed by full recovery. Naming where the URL list comes from is the detail that separates a redirect map from a redirect promise, and scandiweb does not publish it.

Its data scope is itemised further than most. Customers, orders, catalogue, reviews, wishlists and store credit all migrate via validated scripts, with ETL checkpoints and rollback, and post-migration reconciliation with comparative reports. The itemisation names customers plus order history, complete catalogue with images and categories, reviews and ratings with author, wishlists and B2B purchase lists, store credit and reward points, and preserved audit logs. Store credit and reward points are the kind of balance a merchant discovers is missing from a customer complaint rather than from a report, and naming them is a real signal.

The cutover is the tightest published here: a window under 15 minutes using DNS cutover, prior incremental sync and feature flags, with feature flags for instant rollback and automated post-cutover validation. Durations are published by shape of job, three to five months for a standard Magento 1 move and six to nine months with 50 or more custom modules. What was not found on the pages read is any statement about customer passwords, and any trial or rehearsed full migration, which is what holds its validation score to 9. Its two named client write-ups were opened specifically to check the case criterion, and Casa Cravioto and Juguetron are both Adobe Commerce implementations with multi-source inventory and store pickup rather than migrations, with no measured figure, so that criterion scores zero against a claim of dozens of migrations without losing a single URL or a single historical order.

Whidegroup is the only agency on this page whose own content ranks organically for the phrase this page is about, and its data migration article is genuinely technical rather than promotional. It itemises invoices as invoice details associated with each order and credit memos as data related to refunds and returns, names customer groups as segmented by pricing and discounts, and states that the Magento data migration tool works by mapping and validating data fields between Magento 1 and Magento 2. It also tells a merchant the uncomfortable truth that there is no perfect moment to start, because there will always be orders awaiting approval and invoices awaiting payment.

Its case study is the reason it scores at all on the sixth criterion, and it is a good one. Kjellmann.no, a Norwegian office furniture retailer selling to both business and consumer buyers, moved from Magento 1 to Magento 2. All product, customer and order data and configuration settings were fully migrated, the whole job took around 450 hours or ten weeks of work, and the published outcome is a 37% improvement in website performance and a 12.7% lift in conversion rate. Source platform, target platform, named store and a measured figure, all four in one place, which four agencies on this page cannot show once.

Its service page is thinner than its article. Order history, invoices and shipment records are named, data validation after transfer is a named step, old URLs are mapped to their new equivalents with redirects set up to preserve established search visibility, and SEO settings including URLs, meta titles and descriptions are preserved. Migration runs in an isolated staging environment with the final synchronisation in an agreed off-peak maintenance window, and it publishes a three to twelve week range. What was not found on the pages read is any statement about customer passwords, any rollback position, any post-launch verification with a duration, and any recovery expectation. Its own site states Adobe Silver Solution Partner, and its Hyva register card reads Partner.

IWD Agency publishes all three validation components in a single sentence: migration runs in stages with a parallel run, full data reconciliation and a documented rollback plan, so launch is rehearsed instead of crossed fingers. It is the only agency besides scandiweb and Rocket Web to put the three together, and it repeats the commitment in its FAQ, where the new store runs in parallel with the existing one, the cutover is rehearsed before it happens, and the actual switch is a planned monitored event with a rollback plan in place.

It is also unusually blunt about how migrations fail. Most go wrong in predictable ways, it says: redirects nobody mapped, a catalogue that lands half-complete, a checkout that breaks under real traffic, rankings that quietly fall off a cliff. Its data scope covers products, attributes, categories, media and pricing rules, customer accounts, addresses and full order history, CMS pages, blog content and the URL and redirect structure, plus reconnected ERP, PIM and fulfilment integrations, and it commits to reconciling the data after transfer so nothing is silently dropped. On redirects it publishes mapped 301s, preserved URLs and canonical tags and migrated structured data. On B2B it names company accounts, shared catalogues, quoting and contract pricing with ERP sync.

What it does not publish is what a buyer would check next. No statement about customer passwords was found on the pages read, no source for the URL list, no post-launch verification with a stated duration and no measured recovery figure. Its own site states a certified Adobe partner with senior Magento engineers, 17+ years on the platform, migrating stores since 2009 and 4.8 out of 5 from 800+ verified client reviews, but no Adobe tier at a level was found on the pages read and it does not appear in the Hyva register. Its case index publishes 22 case studies with two filtered as replatform or migration, labelled Adobe Commerce with site migration and platform modernisation, and no named migration client or measured post-migration figure surfaced on the index read, so a buyer who is otherwise interested should ask for those two cases directly.

VT Netzwelt states the gate more plainly than anyone else on this page: it cuts over only once every record matches the source and every redirect is in place. It repeats it three ways, that every product, customer and order is verified against the source before cutover, that zero data loss is verified against source, and that data integrity is the core of its process. Every migration starts with a full audit of data, extensions and integrations and then a staging rebuild the client can review before anything goes live. On the redirect side, 301 redirects are mapped for every migrated URL, metadata and structured data transfer, and indexation is monitored through launch.

Its proof is an award rather than a case. It was recognised with the Magical Magento Migration Award at Meet Magento India 2024, specifically for moving stores without losing data, rankings or functionality, and it publishes 12+ years building on Magento, a listed Adobe Solution Partner status with no level stated, and a four to eight week range from scoping to launch. Its Hyva register card reads Bronze. An award from a platform community is a real signal and it is not a case a buyer can open, which is why the sixth criterion scores zero: its case index lists Magento migration work by technology tag, and no case read names a source platform, a target platform and a measured post-migration figure.

The gaps are the ones that matter most in this lane. No statement about customer passwords was found on the pages read, so the heaviest criterion scores zero. No rollback position was found, and the monitoring stops at launch rather than continuing past it with a stated duration. Its B2B content describes what Adobe Commerce builds in, negotiated quotes, multi-level approvals and account catalogues, rather than how a buyer's existing account and pricing data is mapped into them. It is the only agency on this page that has not appeared anywhere in this publication's earlier editions, and on the evidence it publishes about counting records it deserves the place.